OutlawZ

Forum stuff => Blodiblo => Topic started by: Wander on July 28, 2008, 11:27:12 pm



Title: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on July 28, 2008, 11:27:12 pm
In this topic, EVERYTHING IS ALLOWED!

except for one thing: It doesn't get posted in for at least 80 days.



If that does happen, every outlaw who has not yet posted in it except Tony, or otherwise the one who hasn't posted in it for the longest time, receives a SPANKING! (and he gets kicked)


Ow and ofcourse nobody is allowed to post any pictures that include anyone named Tahnee in it.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on July 28, 2008, 11:30:59 pm
(http://orly.yarly.org/orly.jpeg)
(http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/images/jshepherd/2006/05/28/o_rly-ya-rly.jpg)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on July 28, 2008, 11:33:20 pm
(http://s246.photobucket.com/albums/gg87/ilikebee/cat/funnycomments/Dontbesillywrapyourwilly.gif)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on July 28, 2008, 11:34:23 pm
(http://www.smidgy.com/smidgy/images/2007/07/26/lol_cat_icanhascheezburger.jpg)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on July 28, 2008, 11:53:42 pm
(http://img383.imageshack.us/img383/1459/volgendeochtendkk7.jpg)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on July 28, 2008, 11:53:42 pm
What?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on July 28, 2008, 11:54:25 pm
Ok that was fun. G'night! ;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on July 28, 2008, 11:55:46 pm
Realy?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on July 28, 2008, 11:56:16 pm
What about magni ?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on July 28, 2008, 11:56:54 pm
Watch out, I still can post nudpics of my ex-girlsfriend.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on July 29, 2008, 12:02:27 am
Haha, users logged in in the last 15 minutes: 3
Users logged in today: 2


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on July 29, 2008, 12:03:58 am
Btw:


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on July 29, 2008, 12:11:23 am
QTF!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on July 29, 2008, 09:41:30 pm
QTF= Quoted True For, or Quat The ****?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on July 30, 2008, 12:22:31 am
that FWT!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on July 30, 2008, 02:20:10 am
QTF = QT F = Cute Four = Cute  "the amount of koreans my server can hold" = Cute server = compliments from Swift on my server.

Thank you Swift!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on July 30, 2008, 09:16:39 pm
We're gonna need those nudepics Swifty. There's no way around it if you want to stay in OwZ...


Tahnee:

 (http://cache.viewimages.com/xc/51102972.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF1939847EC77F5F8D1CE011678F126B06114A40A659CEC4C8CB6)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on August 02, 2008, 10:11:13 pm
Trust me, you dont want that.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on August 05, 2008, 03:37:25 pm
Ok ok here it is:

(http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/b0/ce/b862820dd7a0e292d266e010._AA240_.L.jpg)



Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on August 06, 2008, 02:14:19 pm
Skinny little ****, not even pretty too...
TOLD YA!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on August 06, 2008, 06:39:47 pm
Biatch!

Her mom is still sexy (try to aviod the head)

(http://www.cinemaretro.com/uploads/welch.jpg)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on August 07, 2008, 02:01:10 pm
(try to aviod the head)
/me Fails


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on August 07, 2008, 03:11:47 pm
Point that i wanted to make is that she has good genes. Old and still a good body (not stuff hanging towards the ground). It's hard to find a girl like that.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on August 08, 2008, 01:58:44 pm
The look in her moms eyes make me think she's a zombie!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on August 08, 2008, 07:30:19 pm
Biatch!

Her mom is still sexy (try to aviod the head)

Can't you guys read?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on August 09, 2008, 05:07:13 pm
Biatch!

Her mom is still sexy (try to aviod the head)

Can't you guys read?

Do you understand basic human psychology?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on August 10, 2008, 01:28:46 pm
Biatch!

Her mom is still sexy (try to aviod the head)

Can't you guys read?

Do you understand basic human psychology?

Nope, but i do understand basic male psychology: First look @ the tit's!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on August 10, 2008, 02:18:53 pm
I like the texture of the wall behind the dinosaur!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on September 06, 2008, 08:40:06 pm
Anybody alive? :P
I guess we're all busy with school starting again and stuff? :P


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on September 06, 2008, 09:18:04 pm
Yeh. The last two-three  weeks, I've had about 0 time free to play lx it seems. Been doing quite a bit schoolwork as well as exercising like crazy. I took a bikeride last sunday that's 19 km long and finished it in about 1 hour and 18 minutes. The route is mostly either up or down. A small part that is straight forward. I took a new bikeride today and I did the same route in 59 minutes and 58 seconds! That's what I call progress. Though I was on the verge of puking most of the contents in my stomach at several points on the ride. I may also be getting a part time job, so I may have less time further on.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on September 07, 2008, 05:06:31 pm
Study huh?

Anyways, does everyone know that our second birthday is coming up in 9 days?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on September 09, 2008, 12:24:20 pm
Yes ofcourse.

Why, do you want to celebrate? I'm not sure if i can be there.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on October 19, 2008, 05:13:29 pm
40 days people, halfway already. You are so glad i saved your ass.     


    for now.......


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on October 19, 2008, 11:50:20 pm
OUR ass?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on October 19, 2008, 11:55:21 pm
Benno's, Gull's, Magni's and Griffin's. Did i forget anyone?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on October 21, 2008, 09:11:47 am
Benno's, Gull's, Magni's and Griffin's. Did i forget anyone?
Tony ;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on October 21, 2008, 01:07:39 pm
I didn't. Read the OP! ;)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Gullveig on October 22, 2008, 07:51:32 pm
hi ;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on October 23, 2008, 09:40:16 am
(http://www.quizilla.com/user_images/P/PallasAthene/1063014830_butwhyistherumgone.jpg)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on October 23, 2008, 12:14:06 pm
(http://www.bloodforoil.org/because-i-said-so/because-i-said-so.gif)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on October 23, 2008, 09:34:56 pm
Apparantly LXA got spanked as well, as did our smileys...


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on October 25, 2008, 03:20:45 pm
Nice
Now we all just have to play LX again to be in touch! ;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Gullveig on October 26, 2008, 11:01:31 am
hmmm.. Am I missing something? Both Lxa and GU are knocked out..

http://www.thegaminguniverse.com/


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on October 26, 2008, 06:22:18 pm
Any idea Thomas?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on October 28, 2008, 11:59:33 pm
blub


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on October 29, 2008, 05:57:09 pm
That's correct! You will now proceed for the washing machine!

Next question:
What's the number of emoticons in the next post?

Good luck!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on October 31, 2008, 12:19:21 pm
 >:( :o :)

looks like 3 emo's to me sir!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on October 31, 2008, 06:17:14 pm
I'm afraid i have to deliver a sad message to you Raf...
We have convincing evidence that you've had help from the public while answering that last question. Since the rules clearly state that you must answer the questions all by yourself, you're now disqualified. I'm sorry.

(http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/804/naamloosfy3.png) (http://imageshack.us)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on October 31, 2008, 10:08:04 pm
gogo suck your balls or something...


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on November 01, 2008, 05:49:23 pm
My spine isn't flexible enough. Perhaps you can do it for me  :-*


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on November 02, 2008, 01:08:03 am
You're all crazy, LIKE ITALIANS!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on November 02, 2008, 02:33:10 pm
Yeah, Italians place people outside of the law indeed. Does that make us all rich media-tycoons? ;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on November 08, 2008, 02:49:19 pm
No! You're just crazy like Italians, you aren'ty actual Italians! Have you never had social studies?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on November 08, 2008, 07:13:52 pm
Nah i'm more into organic chemistry and quantummechanics, sorry :-[


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on November 21, 2008, 03:46:29 pm
Arse saving v2.091b

Only 13 days but it was a start :o


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on November 21, 2008, 06:57:19 pm
Nah i'm more into organic chemistry and quantummechanics, sorry :-[
I'm utterly dissappointed in you :*(


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on November 22, 2008, 06:52:28 pm
Arse saving v2.091b

Only 13 days but it was a start :o


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on November 22, 2008, 11:31:41 pm
Is that a new form of art? quoting someone and adding no text on your own in a cryptic way?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on November 23, 2008, 12:30:05 am
Nah i figured my question would be trivial. Apparently not?
Let's try again..

Arse saving v2.091b

Only 13 days but it was a start :o
WTF???


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on November 24, 2008, 09:20:15 pm
I think it was quite self-explainatory. The Arse Saving v2.091b is referring to saving this threads arse (it can't go for too long withouth posts in the rules.) The 2.091b is a reference to this not being the first time, as well as being somewhat of a parody or weird lookalike of a program version with a version history.

"Only 13 days but it was a start" means it was 13 days since the last post, which isn't too close to the limit, but it was a solid start. He's probably missing a comma in there somewhere also.

I think that's about it.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on November 24, 2008, 10:51:10 pm
I bless the advertisements on these forums:

(http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/5500/owzersst6.th.jpg) (http://img231.imageshack.us/my.php?image=owzersst6.jpg)(http://img231.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif) (http://g.imageshack.us/thpix.php)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on November 25, 2008, 03:49:40 pm
I think it was quite self-explainatory. The Arse Saving v2.091b is referring to saving this threads arse (it can't go for too long withouth posts in the rules.) The 2.091b is a reference to this not being the first time, as well as being somewhat of a parody or weird lookalike of a program version with a version history.

"Only 13 days but it was a start" means it was 13 days since the last post, which isn't too close to the limit, but it was a solid start. He's probably missing a comma in there somewhere also.

I think that's about it.
Aha, sounds plausable indeed.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on November 26, 2008, 12:18:21 am
Speaking of which, do anyone ever click on those commercials? I mean lets face it, this board does not get a lot of guests visit, so if the advertisers who alledgedly are paying Wouter with money (or he is paying them to be able to display the commercials...) want to ever gain on this deal, they would need people to think "hey, that spam-ad sure is interesting, lemme click it and check it out!", and I frankly don't see any OutlawZ doing that. Our attention span >3 seconds, which makes this impossible...

OH, A BALL, so long suckers!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on November 26, 2008, 01:57:38 pm
 :o YOU NEVER CLICK THOSE????


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on December 12, 2008, 01:45:58 am
Wander wants me to tell every1 of you that you are big fat ugly arseholesch.

Amen


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 12, 2008, 01:43:49 pm
Djamn rait! 8)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on December 12, 2008, 10:08:08 pm
Wohoo, I can play LX again!!! And you suck Wouter


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 13, 2008, 02:31:22 pm
Yea but not you!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 14, 2008, 12:46:16 am
RAF!! >:( BUY OLX!!! >:(
"Wants to join" messages FTW 8)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 14, 2008, 12:58:03 am
Aargh **** this, you'll never open! I'm going to bed! :(


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 14, 2008, 03:44:11 pm
Heheh, good thing i didn't :)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 14, 2008, 03:55:16 pm
Penta-posting ftw btw
(http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c312/melitex/Calaveras/Penta.gif)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on December 14, 2008, 10:06:33 pm
Aah, sorry about that Woutz  ;D, but I can't host anymore with the OLX versions, even though the masterserver list is exactly the same.
I also still prefer the old version because it's the only one giving me a decent fps rate on my 3 year old computer.

Well, good thing that you had not yet gone to bed! Enjoyed my time on the computer yesterday and the day before, playing games with Martin, Thomas and you. Hope to see you all (Yes, all of you!  >:() a bit more in the future, though I entered once again a tough period of studying and awkward circadian rhythms. So I can't promise to be online much...

Ah well...
Woof!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on December 16, 2008, 09:32:39 am
(http://www.halolz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/reality.jpg)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 16, 2008, 10:55:21 am
i lol'd


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on December 16, 2008, 05:28:56 pm
I chuckeled, pwnd


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on January 11, 2009, 10:08:40 pm
Yay time, let's celebrate that with some dumb video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZsIQk7o-p0


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on January 27, 2009, 09:14:25 am
nodbody watched it? :o


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on January 27, 2009, 03:05:33 pm
Gave up after a couple of minutes, why?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on January 28, 2009, 05:57:47 pm
Same here. Family Guy >>>> that video.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on February 25, 2009, 12:11:20 pm
Almost a month.

I hate it when wanders fantasy is about to come true >:(


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on February 25, 2009, 12:25:48 pm
I'm not gonna be the one receiving that spankingand kickban, i'm gonna be the one dealing it >:( haha!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on April 15, 2009, 01:42:24 pm
49 days guys, 31 more and Miika's stay here would've been a short one! >:(

Anyway, Thomas do you know what's up with LXA? And when it will be fixed?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on April 15, 2009, 07:45:42 pm
Was keeping an oog on this thread my dear


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on April 15, 2009, 10:10:53 pm
Me too, i just wanted to know what's up with LXA ;)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on April 16, 2009, 08:37:28 pm
Ah nvm..
http://openlierox.sourceforge.net/smf/index.php


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on April 17, 2009, 01:37:44 am
Connection Problems
Sorry, SMF was unable to connect to the database. This may be caused by the server being busy. Please try again later.

So, what does that mean?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on April 17, 2009, 11:06:49 am
Well, that was supposed to be a temporary LXA.

It also explained a bit as to why LXA is down. From what i understood, it used too much bandwith and was shut down by the host. It'll probably have to move to another host now, so it may take some time before it's back up. I asked how much time that would approximately be, but can't read any answer now.


EDIT: It's back on now


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on April 19, 2009, 12:59:40 am
Oh hi. I've been a bit buisy in the week working with school and stuff. Anyway, I see you've found that place. But hopefully by the end of the weekend the place should be back up. According to a text i got from Bram, the hosts shut down the site withouth warning, so it came a bit out of the blue so to speak.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on April 20, 2009, 10:19:24 pm
Haha, Thomas did you even read the OwZ topic on that temporary forum? xD
You did reply on my reply to "i don't have admin powers" but not on what i referred to :P


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on April 21, 2009, 10:31:53 pm
xD xD xD xD xD xD xD!!

Whahahhaah, just posting here to make sure none of you will miss how Thomas got powned by his own mommy! ;D
http://openlierox.sourceforge.net/smf/index.php?topic=20.msg352#msg352


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on April 22, 2009, 12:45:43 am
(http://www.thinkgeek.com/images/products/front/lmao-new.jpg)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on May 08, 2009, 09:21:37 pm
Hey guys, just came over to say that OutlawZ went Zucky got it's first FB win today. In your face! See you in hell!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on May 09, 2009, 12:02:46 am
They counted it for us!

(http://blogs.smh.com.au/sport/headjobbasketball.jpg)
(guess which one is you)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on May 09, 2009, 10:30:55 pm
Seeing as I said in your face, it only makes sense that I'm tha Duke!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on May 10, 2009, 04:45:00 pm
Yes. For people for your IQ, i can imagine so.
Remember when you were in OutlawZ? You were sharper back then..


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on May 18, 2009, 07:49:39 pm
Indeed for people WITH my IQ. Obviously, since you are incapable of constructing sentences with basic grammar in English, you must be at the lower end of the IQ spectrum. Good luck with that Nelson!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on May 19, 2009, 11:00:15 am
You (being a non-Outlaw and thus inferior in every way by default) are not capable of judging my grammar.
Your view on it is so biased by your idea of perfection (Which, by the way, isn't even your own idea but merely your perception of the idea of some individuals you call 'teachers') that you are blind for the brilliance with which my sentences are constructed to perfectly deliver the message they are supposed to deliver, in the context in which they are placed.
The strict rules you have 'learned' concerning the English language may help you practicing simple communication with others that follow the same simple set of rules, yet they do not suffice to understand the deeper nuances in my sentences. I refuse to accept the blame for that.

There is one thing which even i will have to admit though: A non-Outlaw claiming an Outlaw to be 'at the lower end of the IQ-spectrum', in comparison to himself, did make my day. Thank you for that Thomas. :)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on May 19, 2009, 08:40:37 pm
You (being a non-Outlaw and thus inferior in every way by default) are not capable of judging fit to judge my grammar.
Your view on of it is so biased by your idea of perfection (Which, by the way, isn't even your own idea but merely your perception of the idea of from some individuals you call 'teachers'), that you are blind for of the brilliance with which my sentences are constructed to perfectly deliver the message they are supposed to deliver, in the context in of which they are placed.
The strict rules you have 'learned' concerning the English language, may help you practicing simple communication with others that follow the same simple set of rules, yet they do not suffice to understand the deeper nuances in of my sentences. I refuse to accept the blame for that.

There is one thing which even i will have to admit though: A non-Outlaw claiming an Outlaw to be 'at the lower end of the IQ-spectrum', in comparison to himself, did make my day. Thank you for that Thomas. :)

Linguistical **** for the win! I hope you do not mind that I used those preconcieved rules I for some reason believe to be a sense of perfection, which I according to you, got from my teachers (which is partly untrue, since I've learned most English grammar by practical applicance) to fix some minor mistakes. One thing I'm unsure of though, was your application of "may help you practicing" which I believe should be "may help you to practice". But I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt there, since I am not completely sure about that.

I look forward to reading your answer Nelson!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Sakmongkol on May 19, 2009, 11:30:47 pm
I think some commas could be useful here:
Linguistical **** for the win! I hope you do not mind that I used those preconcieved rules I, for some reason, believe to be a sense of perfection, which I, according to you, got from my teachers (which is partly untrue, since I've learned most English grammar by practical applicance) to fix some minor mistakes.

Some further comments:

You (being a non-Outlaw and thus inferior in every way by default) are not capable of judging fit to judge my grammar.
I don't see why 'capable of judging' couldn't be applied here. 'Fit to judge' also somewhat changes the original meaning.

Your view on of it is so biased by your idea of perfection (Which, by the way, isn't even your own idea but merely your perception of the idea of from some individuals you call 'teachers'), that you are blind for of the brilliance with which my sentences are constructed to perfectly deliver the message they are supposed to deliver, in the context in of which they are placed.
All of the preposition corrections here are either wrong or unnecessary. 'View on' means a person's outlook and opinions on something and his understanding of it, while 'view of' usually means a physical sight of something. 'Idea of' makes perfect sense also, as in 'the idea of the individuals'; 'the individuals' idea'. 'Blind of' would suggest a person being blind because of something, which could make sense in this case with the word 'brilliance' following it, but I think it is safe to say the meaning Wander was really going after is indeed 'blind for', as in 'incapable of seeing the brilliance'. Lastly, I am fairly certain that Wander's sentences are placed in a context, not of a context.

Sorry for butting in, but this is indeed quite fun. :)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on May 20, 2009, 01:08:15 am
Commas aren't necessary. At least not for someone inspired by Kafka's lack of punctuation :P

It should be "fit" because "capable" means that I am not able to judge the grammar. I clearly judge his grammar, so being "fit" for it, is more appropirate.

"View of", refers not necessarily to something that's physical, but to something which is in some sense "objective". The pure view however, is blocked by my "bias". If it were "your biased view", it would be "on". But since my view has not been "biased" so to speak yet, I argue that it is "of".

I'm not blind because of, or to accomodate the "brilliance". I do not see the "brilliance".

"of the idea of" does not flow good, and "from" is more descriptive.

they are placed in the context. notice the "in the context". "of" is here in regards to the objective: "which". Actually, my mistake there. I mis-interpreted what "which" was referring to. Obviously the "correct" formulation would be "in the context they are placed", though "they are placed" seems out of place, but I can't come up with a proper alternative at the moment.



Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on May 20, 2009, 01:18:40 am
Commas aren't necessary. At least not for someone inspired by Kafka's lack of punctuation :P

It should be "fit" because "capable" means that I am not able to judge the grammar. I clearly judge his grammar, so being "fit" for it, is more appropirate.

"View of", refers not necessarily to something that's physical, but to something which is in some sense "objective". The pure view however, is blocked by my "bias". If it were "your biased view", it would be "on". But since my view has not been "biased" so to speak yet, I argue that it is "of".

I'm not blind because of, or to accomodate the "brilliance". I do not see the "brilliance".

"of the idea of" does not flow good, and "from" is more descriptive.

they are placed in the context. notice the "in the context". "of" is here in regards to the objective: "which". Actually, my mistake there. I mis-interpreted what "which" was referring to. Obviously the "correct" formulation would be "in the context they are placed", though "they are placed" seems out of place, but I can't come up with a proper alternative at the moment.
I rest my case.


Also:
Sorry for butting in
lol ;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on May 20, 2009, 11:29:39 am
I rest my case.

So you admit defeat Nelson?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on May 20, 2009, 03:00:23 pm
The contrary. I thank you for proving my point. :)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on May 20, 2009, 10:43:09 pm
The contrary. I thank you for proving my point. :)

That I do not understand the intrical "awesomeness" that lies within your, shall I say, special formulation? Or that me correcting your grammar, is due to my allegded belief that I am promoting some sort of "perfection" which is really just a delusion since it apparantly is inherited from indoctrinations from some teachers of mine?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on May 21, 2009, 04:21:12 pm
The latter was neither my point, nor did you get it right, nor did you prove it.
You have proven incapable of understanding the intrical brilliance of my posts.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on May 22, 2009, 12:39:51 am
You sure you don't mean "intricate" as opposed to "intrical"?

Alloow me to dechipher the post, so you may prove where I misunderstand you though:
1: Since I am not an Outlaw, I can't judge my grammar
2: My view of grammar is so biased on an idea of perfection (which isn't an idea of perfection, but my view of perfection from someone I call "teachers") that I am unable to see the perfection that your sentences are constructed with to deliver perfectly the original message and context on which they are based of.
3: The strict rules I use for grammar, helps in simple communication, but applying them on your communication, fails to miss the deeper meaning of your sentences. You will not be called responsible for that.
4: For me to claim that you are on the lower end of the IQ spectrum, made your day. Thank me for that.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on May 22, 2009, 11:22:09 pm
I am getting a bit tired of trying to explain myself to you, who obviously don't understand the sophisticated idea of all that i say, while i do not owe you any explanation in the first place.
Out of the goodness of my heart though, and because we've been in clans together for such a significant part of both our LX careers, i will give it another try.

You will always be the first and foremost person to judge your own grammar. All i said was that you, being inferior in every way including grammar, cannot judge mine.
Your view of perfection certainly is your idea of perfection. You simply didn't make it all up by yourself (you couldn't have because the English language was there before you were). You needed the help of people who you supposed to have 'mastered' the language, to teach it to you. Regardless of who those people were or how much attention you payed to them, your idea of perfection will never be more than just your impression of their idea(s) of it.
The strict rules you use for grammar help in simple communication, but applying them on my communication leads to a failure of understanding the deeper meaning of my posts. I will not be called responsible for that.
For you to claim that i am on the lower end of the IQ spectrum, made my day. Thank you for doing that.

I do hope that by now, you will notice that all i am saying is that i am superior to you. I back that up with the evidence that i am an Outlaw and you are not.
Grammar really is only a tiny aspect of a bigger picture, Thomas. Although it did ofcourse not surprise me to see how you failed to understand that.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on May 24, 2009, 01:11:03 am
I meant "your" grammar. For some reason "me" snuck into there...

Where does my "idea of perfection" come into play anyway? As far as I've understood, this all come from me correcting a tiny fraction of grammar from your sentance where you seem to insult me for my IQ which is apparantly lower than yours. I do not see once where I mentioned perfection (nor anything that suggests that grammar is linked to such either) except in the cases where I was attempting to question you of your mention of "my idea of perfection".

You use an awfull lot of unecassary words to forumlate something as simple as "you suck" (which is the essence of you claiming to  be superiour to me).

Where did I fail to understand that grammar was only a tiny aspect of a bigger picture? Where was I supposed to "understand", or show that i understand that grammar is only a part of a bigger picture? What is "a bigger picture" anyway? Is it, as I suspect, something that according to you is somehow beyond my ability to comprehend (of course neither referenced nor backed up with anything to affirm such a conlusion.)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on May 24, 2009, 04:17:09 pm
Your idea of perfection obviously came into play when you felt the need to correct my grammar.

The fact that one being is superior over another, is quite dull when the superior being doesn't use it's superiority. I think a polar beer could slay a breeding penguin with ease. However, both species being on opposite sides of the world makes it a dull fact (If you'll allow me to call it a 'fact'). However, a cheetah hunting down an antilope is in my opinion quite an amazing thing to look at.
Similarly, i could just tell you that "you suck", without displaying my superiority. I would find that quite dull.

Quote
Where did I fail to understand that grammar was only a tiny aspect of a bigger picture? Where was I supposed to "understand", or show that i understand that grammar is only a part of a bigger picture?
Obviously, since you are incapable of constructing sentences with basic grammar in English, you must be at the lower end of the IQ spectrum.
I hope this speeks for itself.

Now the next one: "What is a bigger picture anyway?"
I hope i do not have to go into detail to you about the meanings and definitions of the word 'picture', like i needed to explain a simple word as 'cool' to the people in the [Axe] clan. As a former Outlaw, i hope you'll be better than they are. Thus, i hope this question was a phylosophical one.
As all phylosophical questions, it is supposed to be thought about in different ways by different people (but mainly the author). Therefore, i would like to return your question to you.
When 'grammar is a tiny aspect in a bigger picture', with reference to IQ, what is a 'bigger picture'?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on May 24, 2009, 06:57:39 pm
Your idea of perfection obviously came into play when you felt the need to correct my grammar.
Actually, it was just a cheap shot at you due to your claim of me being situated at the lower end of the IQ spectrum. Perfection per se had little to do with it as far as I was concerned.

The fact that one being is superior over another, is quite dull when the superior being doesn't use it's superiority. I think a polar beer could slay a breeding penguin with ease. However, both species being on opposite sides of the world makes it a dull fact (If you'll allow me to call it a 'fact'). However, a cheetah hunting down an antilope is in my opinion quite an amazing thing to look at.
Similarly, i could just tell you that "you suck", without displaying my superiority. I would find that quite dull.
Which is why you resorted to linguistical ****? You do know that in the end, you end up with white goo all over your stomach or all over the floor, right?

Quote
Where did I fail to understand that grammar was only a tiny aspect of a bigger picture? Where was I supposed to "understand", or show that i understand that grammar is only a part of a bigger picture?
Obviously, since you are incapable of constructing sentences with basic grammar in English, you must be at the lower end of the IQ spectrum.
I hope this speeks for itself.
Taken in context with the cheap remark you made about my place within the IQ-spectrum, it should have been a clear indicator to you that my remark was not taking into consideration "a big picture", but that it was rather a response to your earlier remark about my place in the IQ-spectrum.

Now the next one: "What is a bigger picture anyway?"
I hope i do not have to go into detail to you about the meanings and definitions of the word 'picture', like i needed to explain a simple word as 'cool' to the people in the [Axe] clan. As a former Outlaw, i hope you'll be better than they are. Thus, i hope this question was a phylosophical one.
As all phylosophical questions, it is supposed to be thought about in different ways by different people (but mainly the author). Therefore, i would like to return your question to you.
When 'grammar is a tiny aspect in a bigger picture', with reference to IQ, what is a 'bigger picture'?
You're the one referencing "a bigger picture".  As far as I can see, there is no clear indication of what exactly "a bigger picture" is. Thus I cannot answer your question, since I do not know to what in specific you were referring to in the first place. Which obviously, is the reason for my question in the first place.

I'm looking forward to your answer Nelson!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on May 24, 2009, 09:31:30 pm
So basically, all your remarks were 'cheap shots' instead of intelligent, well-based arguments, and your last question was not a phylosophical one but merely an (intentional?) display of your ignorance.
I'm sorry Thomas, i thought we could have an intelligent discussion here. Clearly your mental decline since you've been kicked was more rapid than i thought.
I'm sorry.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Sakmongkol on May 25, 2009, 12:36:37 am
Hey!

I think this discussion has been a mighty interesting one to follow, and I would like to believe it will stay so for years to come. So far my very favorite part has been this:

polar beer

I'm eagerly waiting for more of these! 8)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on May 25, 2009, 02:48:26 pm
As you know, beer consists of many different molecules. Over 95% of those molecules are watermolecules, which amongst the most polar molecules we know. Another main component of beer is alcohol (usually over 5% in volume), which is polar too.
However, you are right in questioning the polarity of a beer. When we take the 'beer' as a whole, no matter how many polar molecules it is made of, it is not polar. So when i am talking about a 'polar beer', it should be clear that i am not talking about a beer that has a minor difference in electric charge between it's ends. Instead, i am talking about a beer that is situated at or around one pole of the earth!
To continue my reasoning for those who still don't understand: No human species originate at or around the south pole, while not far from the North pole, the Inuit live. Although Inuit are famous for other things than their beer, they certainly do have it.
At the north pole though, there are no penguins. Those only occur in the wild at the south pole of the earth. And although breeding penguins and beer could get into contact in certain zoo's all around the world , the beer would not be a polar beer then (there are, atm, no zoo's with penguins at or around the north pole).
So although a polar beer could kill a breeding penguin with ease, it is not likely to ever do that and thus it is a dull 'fact'.

Any more questions?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on May 26, 2009, 05:09:18 pm
Do you like cheese?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on May 26, 2009, 05:54:30 pm
So basically, all your remarks were 'cheap shots' instead of intelligent, well-based arguments, and your last question was not a phylosophical one but merely an (intentional?) display of your ignorance.
ugh. The initial remark was a "cheap shot", much like your crotch-joke was a "cheap-shot"

I'm sorry Thomas, i thought we could have an intelligent discussion here. Clearly your mental decline since you've been kicked was more rapid than i thought.
I'm sorry.
Intelligent discussion? I got the impression that we were supposed to "pose" as intellectual d00ds (at least that was what you seemed to be doing as far as I could see), through confusing and unnecessary linguistical abuse. I must have misunderstood your intention with your posts. I do not see why you are sorry though. If you are as intelligent as you seem to be indicating (though it may still be a pose, hard to tell over written letters), you should know that intelligence seems to have little correlation with fluctuations of clan-memberships in regards to 2D-games in the interweb.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on May 26, 2009, 05:56:52 pm
Any more questions?

Is beer dependant on location? e.g. If I drink a German beer in Botswana, I'm drinking a Botswanian beer?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on June 03, 2009, 02:13:41 pm
The 1 week silence rule decleares me the winner of this debate! Thank you guys, I couldn't have done it withouth you!  ;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on June 04, 2009, 03:33:25 pm
Indeed Thomas, for a debate you need an opponent to be able to win.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Magni on June 05, 2009, 02:07:50 pm
As you know, beer consists of many different molecules. Over 95% of those molecules are watermolecules, which amongst the most polar molecules we know. Another main component of beer is alcohol (usually over 5% in volume), which is polar too.

One litre of beer containing 10% alcohol consists of 0.95 l water and 0.10 l alcohol = a total of 1.05 litre beer, the same phenomenon applies to 1.05 litres of beer and so on.  Therefor we can derive the following formula:

Amount_of_Beer = beer * 1.05^n, n--->∞

n -->∞, thus 1.05 -->∞. We can therefor conclude that Amount_of_Beer = ∞

The universe expand at the speed of light(3.0*10^8 m/s != ∞).

=>  Amount_of_Beer > universe .

We can hereby conclude that the belived nothingness outside the universe actually consists of beer and all matter originates from the components of beer (H_20 and C_2H_5OH)

Finally I sincerely thank Wouter for his brilliant observations concerning the nature of beer.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on June 05, 2009, 05:23:11 pm
I like your philosophy! :D

However, the alcoholpercentage of beer is measured in volume percentages. The 95% was clearly about the amount of molecules, which is a totally different thing. A single CH3CH2OH (which i assume you meant when typing 'C_2H_5OH', which doesn't exist ofcourse) molecule takes up much more volume than a single H2O molecule does.
I'm very sorry that i have to be the one to deny the infinite presence of beer, but your formula is incorrect. :(


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on July 22, 2009, 09:18:52 am
Guess who just passed his drivers test... ;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on July 22, 2009, 10:02:06 pm
Keira Knightley!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Magni on July 23, 2009, 01:10:50 pm
Guess who just passed his drivers test... ;D
A polar bear?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on July 23, 2009, 01:29:18 pm
Both wrong! Only one guess left...


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on July 24, 2009, 12:22:21 pm
a moron?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on July 24, 2009, 03:17:53 pm
Someone who poses a serious danger in traffic.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on July 25, 2009, 11:07:12 am
Correct, i did!! ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on August 13, 2009, 12:24:21 am
Guess who is a coward next friday?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on August 13, 2009, 11:40:44 am
I am, i have to write a report. I'll sure as hell be there friday next week though!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on September 15, 2009, 07:01:52 pm
You guys are getting lazy, where's the spam?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Magni on September 19, 2009, 03:52:13 pm
You asked for it!!!!

spamspamspamspam


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on October 30, 2009, 02:10:34 am
ooz nooz :o


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on October 31, 2009, 03:27:38 pm
Do you guys still play? I sometimes do in the weekends if I got some time.
Well if you still play, make sure to check the servers in the weekends and please find me there! ;)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on November 01, 2009, 04:59:24 pm
I haven't played this sumer. I'll probably start playing again in a couple of weeks.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Sakmongkol on November 01, 2009, 06:49:19 pm
I think I'll start playing again in around 158 days. Hopefully. =)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on November 02, 2009, 02:29:45 am
Happy to see you guys are still around and I'll be looking forward to play with you again! :)
How's life treating you?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on November 02, 2009, 12:16:45 pm
I haven't played too much. A few hours in the weekend maybe. Usually I'll be in IRC's server or something, and I have failed to locate other OwZ'ers for a few months now :(


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on November 06, 2009, 08:08:13 pm
ZOMG (http://www.openlierox.net/forum/index.php/topic,12716.0.html)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on November 06, 2009, 10:44:06 pm
ZOMG (http://www.openlierox.net/forum/index.php/topic,12716.0.html)

Yeah, I'm multiclanning. Luckily one of our rules is that our members have their own boundaries. :) And like many youngsters addicted to adrenaline tend to do, I decided to check how far these boundaries actually reach.

By the way Gaston and Sak, I just saw you two playing in IRC's server but there was no room and I've been playing for a couple of hours already anyway so I'm gonna do something else now. I'll catch you guys later  :-* or kill you, not sure yet.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on November 07, 2009, 07:49:41 pm
Nice idea Raf :)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on November 08, 2009, 03:38:15 am
ZOMG (http://www.openlierox.net/forum/index.php/topic,12716.0.html)

Yeah, I'm multiclanning. Luckily one of our rules is that our members have their own boundaries. :) And as many youngsters addicted to adrenaline tend to do, I decided to check how far these boundaries actually reach.

By the way Gaston and Sak, I just saw you two playing in IRC's server but there was no room and I've been playing for a couple of hours already anyway so I'm gonna do something else now. I'll catch you guys later  :-* or kill you, not sure yet.

So you found a loophole, eh? One day, I'll get you... One day!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on December 02, 2009, 10:05:07 pm
SPLASH!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 03, 2009, 11:25:29 am
omg


What just happened?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on December 04, 2009, 11:09:25 am
I went to the toilet.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 04, 2009, 01:41:56 pm
Ah, phew. :)

I was getting visions of blood being splashed all over your bedroom wall. No idea why..


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on December 07, 2009, 08:12:30 am
aaah, no, my period isn't for another two weeks.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on December 18, 2009, 03:21:36 am
Have a happy period


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 18, 2009, 11:24:07 am
You just stole my post! >:(


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on December 20, 2009, 01:20:42 pm
Oh sorry, ill return it when i get bored of it.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 20, 2009, 07:30:02 pm
Hmpf


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 20, 2009, 08:25:06 pm
BTW.

I haven't played this sumer. I'll probably start playing again in a couple of weeks.

I haven't yet done what i figured i'd do in those weeks (which is furnituring my bedroom), so i shouldn't actually be active yet. However, i decided that i can play in the living room just as well, so i hereby officially pronounce myself active again! ;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on December 25, 2009, 03:12:04 am
wtf, I don't believe it. The period was happy though. Perhaps I should consider playing sometimes during the vacation as well.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on December 26, 2009, 04:28:21 pm
How's the Chopin I gave you going Thomas?

I'm in the middle of my exam period, so I really don't have time to play much. Not even in my [gb] clanwars. :(

Happy periods, oh god. Well perhaps better than no period at all.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on December 28, 2009, 03:08:24 pm
How's the Chopin I gave you going Thomas?

I'm in the middle of my exam period, so I really don't have time to play much. Not even in my [gb] clanwars. :(

Happy periods, oh god. Well perhaps better than no period at all.

Well, I practiced a few hours for a week after I got it, then the exam period started kicking in, after that I have more or less just improvised for an hour a few times a week until I feel like crushing the piano. There are so many complex combinations rythmically (at least for me), that I need to learn to really set my left hand free from my right hand before I'll dare to continue...


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on January 02, 2010, 08:54:07 pm
Well, I practiced a few hours for a week after I got it, then the exam period started kicking in, after that I have more or less just improvised for an hour a few times a week until I feel like crushing the piano. There are so many complex combinations rythmically (at least for me), that I need to learn to really set my left hand free from my right hand before I'll dare to continue...

:D
You will perhaps not learn what you're aiming for: the independent playing of both hands, but you'll learn much other things, playing this piece. It has taken me 2 months already and I can only play 6 of the 8 pages I think. Anyway, I think it's one of the most beautiful pieces for piano and I'll be happy, the moment I can really play in it's whole.

Happy Newyear to all of you! May all your wishes come true!
My wish is to be back in [OwZ], because Wander asked me to leave 2 days ago and I was so loyal to obey him. :( Hehehe, I still got access to the secret boards though!  ;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on January 03, 2010, 12:11:56 am
Well, I can't let you back in since I'm not officially in OwZ :(

About Chopin though:  The learning curve going through that piece is too steep for me at the moment, so I'll need at least a few months of practicing before I'll be technically skilled enough to go through it withouth stumbling in the easyest places :P


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on January 03, 2010, 10:29:07 pm
As much as I regret your leaving Raf (I never meant for this to happen! :'(), I am very sorry. Our rules state that for you to rejoin, you must have an official invitation. Also, as a member of this clan, I must know my own boundaries, and as much as i would like to... I cannot give you an invitation without consulting the entire (active) clan first.

And well, here's the nasty part: The majority of our active members have actually more or less 'left' the clan, and therefore abandoned their voice in major clan-decisions. However, since they are still official members, I do have to wait for their vote. Ergo: Sorry man, my hands are tied... :(


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on January 04, 2010, 12:31:39 am
I have an idea. Let's all leave the clan exept for Tony and make new clan with the same name and history. Only thing that can go wrong is that Tony comes back and starts claiming we are fake.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on January 04, 2010, 04:30:25 am
As much as I regret your leaving Raf (I never meant for this to happen! :'(), I am very sorry. Our rules state that for you to rejoin, you must have an official invitation. Also, as a member of this clan, I must know my own boundaries, and as much as i would like to... I cannot give you an invitation without consulting the entire (active) clan first.

And well, here's the nasty part: The majority of our active members have actually more or less 'left' the clan, and therefore abandoned their voice in major clan-decisions. However, since they are still official members, I do have to wait for their vote. Ergo: Sorry man, my hands are tied... :(

I understand. Is it ok if I use the trial-tag -:-*T|░(-=%!<OwZ>!%=-)░|T*-:- in the meanwhile?

I have an idea. Let's all leave the clan exept for Tony and make new clan with the same name and history. Only thing that can go wrong is that Tony comes back and starts claiming we are fake.
;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on January 04, 2010, 03:00:06 pm
I understand. Is it ok if I use the trial-tag -:-*T|░(-=%!<OwZ>!%=-)░|T*-:- in the meanwhile?
Yea go ahead. Don't forget the '{' and '}' signs though, between the * and the T.

I have an idea. Let's all leave the clan exept for Tony and make new clan with the same name and history. Only thing that can go wrong is that Tony comes back and starts claiming we are fake.
Brilliant! Who would believe Tony anyway? ;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on January 06, 2010, 02:33:18 pm
Who's Tony? ??? ??? ??? ???


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on January 12, 2010, 10:54:53 pm
He is your grandpa


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on January 29, 2010, 03:57:43 am
If I remember right, we're celebrating Swift's birthday today. :)

Have a good one! :-*


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on January 29, 2010, 11:20:06 am
Yay almost. It is all about tomarrow ;)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on January 30, 2010, 03:17:54 am
Ah damn, well better one day early than one day late. ;) Happy birthday!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on January 30, 2010, 12:02:14 pm
Thank you  :D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on February 02, 2010, 10:44:53 pm
(a bit late) happy birthday! yumm, Lost is starting again soon :D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on February 11, 2010, 01:06:23 am
its cold outside :S


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on February 12, 2010, 11:31:12 am
Please let that cold winterweather move to Vancouver and leave us alone...


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on February 15, 2010, 12:43:09 pm
Psssh, Wouter and Niels, you're both such sissies.  :P

Anyway, how about you guys get your butts active again and challenge [gb]? I'll be playing for [OwZ], unless I'm still kicked, don't know about my current status. It would be cool to see some activity in game from you all again.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on February 16, 2010, 04:54:09 pm
You'd be co÷rdinating our opponent, wouldn't you?

I see some oppurtunities here... ;)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on February 16, 2010, 09:17:01 pm
Bahahahaha, Wouter what have you done?!?

Ads with "interacial gay dating"... Damn, I should have never told you my secret :(


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on February 17, 2010, 11:48:43 am
You do know that those are Google Adds, right?
And that we all see different adds, based on what we personally are interested in...


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on February 27, 2010, 07:06:11 pm
You do know that those are Google Adds, right?
And that we all see different adds, based on what we personally are interested in...

Yeah, but I only see them on this site, and I assume this isn't the only site using google ads. I'm thinking you've done some dirtey deals!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on April 05, 2010, 02:17:56 am
Spam!

Does anyone play anymore? I haven't personally touched the game in months...


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on April 05, 2010, 08:42:23 pm
I have, but never more than just a couple of seconds, or 2 minutes at most.
Also I haven't updated yet so I'm being rejected from every server :P


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on April 06, 2010, 02:17:41 pm
OwZ just cant die, even though it's dead.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on April 16, 2010, 09:31:59 pm
Been playing online a bit today, and even met Raf there!

We even played a CW against hB. Nice games, but we eventually lost by 1 live.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on July 01, 2010, 11:45:30 pm
Does anyone wanna calculate how close we got to SPANKING (and kicking) two of our members this week?!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on July 30, 2010, 03:02:22 am
*bends over*


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on October 29, 2010, 11:25:12 am
Hey, can I rejoin OwZ soon? I know I've been kicked for like 3 years or something, but it'd be cool if I could be a member again. I mean all you guys probably suck in LX now anyway, so what's one more sucker gonna hurt...?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on October 29, 2010, 01:13:09 pm
Hey, can I rejoin OwZ soon? I know I've been kicked for like 3 years or something, but it'd be cool if I could be a member again. I mean all you guys probably suck in LX now anyway, so what's one more sucker gonna hurt...?

Your request will be taken into consideration.
Please wait patiently while we fill in all the neccessary forms and take all bureaucratic detours that might or might not actually result in an answer to your question.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on December 09, 2010, 05:04:50 pm
Uh-oh!

*voorover bukken doet*


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on December 19, 2010, 01:47:46 pm
ugh.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 19, 2010, 06:11:15 pm
Show yourself! :D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on December 23, 2010, 10:36:19 pm
Spanking is sooooo 2009


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on December 25, 2010, 12:52:52 pm
Yea but it's gonna be 2011 as well. :)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on January 24, 2011, 06:55:23 pm
Spaniking may be 2009, but spanktime is so 2008!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on January 25, 2011, 02:17:44 pm
Yeah.. It's a grandpa thing


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on April 10, 2011, 05:58:58 pm
 :-*


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on April 11, 2011, 12:02:24 pm
:-*
Yeah thanks, that was close indeed :D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on April 14, 2011, 07:20:54 pm
gross


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on April 27, 2011, 10:49:07 pm
Jow, does anyone (Thomas?) know what's up with LXA?

EDIT:
Ow I found out already. http://www.lxalliance.net/forum/index.php does work.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on May 19, 2011, 06:31:25 pm
Next time, before clan war , explain us how do the colour cw works Odin :D
(we thought this was a joke)
Took me a few minutes to recover from that ;D


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Rafman on May 19, 2011, 11:54:50 pm
Next time, before clan war , explain us how do the colour cw works Odin :D
(we thought this was a joke)
Took me a few minutes to recover from that ;D

<--- almost died of laughter  ;D

P.S.
In Raf's movie (which is about children's eyes btw), at 1.20, the lirics are "I know you, I've seen your face before". Is there anyone else besides me who thinks the same when he sees the picture that is shown there? :D (1.21-1.25)


- picture  :D  :D  :D
That just can't be true.
Holy god. Brilliant.
Out of all the pictures, they had to take that one.
Really, I think I know the criminal mind behind the making-of this movie.

Right? :)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on May 20, 2011, 12:08:03 pm
Amazing how it is still possible to have fun with lx.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on May 20, 2011, 01:27:26 pm
Next time, before clan war , explain us how do the colour cw works Odin :D
(we thought this was a joke)
Took me a few minutes to recover from that ;D

<--- almost died of laughter  ;D

P.S.
In Raf's movie (which is about children's eyes btw), at 1.20, the lirics are "I know you, I've seen your face before". Is there anyone else besides me who thinks the same when he sees the picture that is shown there? :D (1.21-1.25)


- picture  :D  :D  :D
That just can't be true.
Holy god. Brilliant.
Out of all the pictures, they had to take that one.
Really, I think I know the criminal mind behind the making-of this movie.

Right? :)

My thoughts exactly :D

And Niels, yea you should stop by some time. We're an active clan nowadays, with at least 5 of us online yesterday. ;)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on May 20, 2011, 07:23:27 pm
No thanks, I rather invest my time in making young girls come to my home.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on May 21, 2011, 03:18:32 pm
Maybe you should move in here then


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on August 12, 2011, 12:36:41 pm
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 80 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.  

Aw!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on August 12, 2011, 02:28:15 pm
Omegawdd..
Time for you guys to give Griff a SPANKING! (and a kickban)?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on August 12, 2011, 09:47:35 pm
I think the reason this happened is because Wouter hasnt been revoked of his access to these forums even though he left us! I say ban Wouter from the forums!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on August 14, 2011, 05:46:27 am
Hmpff. Quivers, Kurt, Griff and any random guy can see this and post here as well if he registers an account. Why should I be banned?


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on October 25, 2011, 03:36:58 pm
Time to save some ass :)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Swift on September 27, 2013, 02:22:07 am
Almost two years. This is outrageous!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on September 29, 2013, 01:07:37 pm
We should kickban ourselves immediately. All of us!


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on November 05, 2013, 12:57:39 am
Totez agree. I dont think I've played lx in like 3-4 months. Should really play it a bit more, but whenever I check noone interesting seems online :\


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on November 08, 2013, 04:15:14 pm
Yeah. I think that after years and years of dying, the game is finally dying.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on November 12, 2013, 10:28:51 pm
The last breaths are just taking quite long. Only thing that could save it would be a rebirth of sorts, but I'm not holding my breath.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on November 13, 2013, 05:22:11 pm
But OwZ will never die!! 8)


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Wander on November 13, 2013, 05:22:50 pm
Over the years, it will slowly slip into hybernation.


Title: Re: SPANKTIME!!
Post by: Hwoarang on November 13, 2013, 06:11:39 pm
My strategy is the same as in Alien(s). I assume 200 years somewhere down the line, someone will find OwZ floating around in space, and revive us from our hibernated sleep, ready for us to fight again.